Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP Global Trade Services (GTS)
Viewing all 578 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

SAP GTS -Business Partner Not updated -Create and Update

March 16, 2016, 12:19 pm
$
0
0

Hello  ,

 

In our production system from 2 days back , we are encountering issue where  When End user customer Partner function Z1 is getting created  ,and transfered to GTS -In GTS Business Partner is not getting created,  entry is present in  /SAPSLL/PNTBP table  -Both exernal number (Feeder System ECC) and internal number from SAP GTS is updated ,but  in tTable BUT000 Business Partner  is not getting updated, Any sugesttions how to get the business partner number recreated ,

                                            Checked in SLG1 for business partner update Pls check attached screenshot , Issue is in Create Activity  : No Business Partner exist and no GUID Exist .

 

Thanks

Vamsi

↧
Search

"SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000010) not transferred".

February 19, 2012, 7:05 am
$
0
0

Hi guys,

 

When we create outbound delivery for a sales order we are getting below message .

"SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000010) not transferred".

Could any body help in this issue.

 

Sreekanth

↧
↧

SPL Screening issues in GTS 11

December 30, 2015, 5:44 am
$
0
0

I am running into some odd behavior when I try and do general address screening for SPL checks.  I am taking names directly from the SPL list that I loaded yet when I screen them most are not getting blocked even though I am entering the exact name/country that is on the SPL list.

 

All the configuration is complete.

 

I have attached a document with some screen shots that might help.

 

I have made multiple changes to the detail control for the name.

 

I could not fit the last two screenshots one was of the SPL entry "EL DULCE" and the second was a shot of the results of the general address check when I entered EL DULCE and MX.  The system did not find a match even though I entered the exact name.

 

It seems like if I enter the exact address of the entry from one of the denied party lists the system won't find it. It sometimes will match on other strings etc. I was able to get a hit for El CHAYO which is on the list, but when I took one of the other entries in the detail list and ran that address it doesn't find a match.

 

Update: I'm still finding the behavior odd. I would have expected that every entry that is on an SPL list in the system would get blocked if I screened the exact name in the general address screening but that is not the case.

 

Also I'm wondering how this search is actually carried out since normally the SPL and BP's would be indexed before screening but since the general address check is more or less an ad hoc check there isn't an index for the address I type in or is one generated in the background?

 

If the system can't find an entry that is on the SPL list that I have entered exactly the same way I am very concerned on what is happening in the background when it checks BP's?

 

NEW:

 

I have entered a ticket with SAP about this and they have sent this to the developers because they couldn't understand the behavior either.

 

So a question for GTS users. Have any of you tried taking entries from your current SPL list in GTS and then using that name/address to run a general address screening? If so are do you get blocks for 100% of the entries that you try?  I would expect that I should but I am not and I am entering the exact name/address as resides in the SPL list.

↧

Manual updating of export declaration

March 15, 2016, 12:43 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I wonder how it is in your systems.

After the proforma has been transferred to GTS, the export declaration is created and manu of the fields for the item, like weight can be edited manually.

But my user would like to be able to update the "Item Quantity" and  "unit of measure" in the item tab "General data". But that field is grayed out and I can't find a way to unlock it. What do you think ?

Thank you in advance.

Regards,

Olaf

↧

Email addresses for Business partners

May 5, 2010, 3:48 am
$
0
0

Hi ,

We have a requirement to purge out email addresses for

 

1. Specific business partners  - BP nos would be provided by the customer.

My understanding is that the Business partner information is stored in the table BUT000 and that the email address information is stored in ADR6 table.

 

I could identify that ADR6 and ADRC join on Address number and Person Number. However, am not able to identify the common link between ADRC and BUT000..

 

Can you kindly advise if I am looking in the correct dimension and alternateively help me with the set of tables and the join logic between them,

 

 

2. Email addresses specified in the SPRO configuration for Action Definitions( Customs Management)

This information is again stored in ADR6.. How can we identify the mapping between the Action Definition and the email address from the backend tables and purge the same from all the involved tables.

What would be the tables involved.

↧
↧

Upgrade from GTS 9.0 to GTS 11.0

March 18, 2016, 5:38 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

We need to upgrade our system from GTS 9.0 to GTS 11.0 Can someone please assist with the steps or procedure for doing the same.

What I understood after going through various forums is that we cannot directly upgrade from GTS 9.0 to GTS 11.0 .First we need to update from 9.0 to 10.0 and then 10.0 to 11.0.  please confirm if that's the case. also what are other dependencies involved with these upgrades. Request to share more details on steps or procedure.

Regards,

Somya

↧

Name of customs coworker in customs declaration

March 18, 2016, 3:55 am
$
0
0

Hi there,

with the new release you have the possibility to receive with the status 17 message from customs (E_EXP_STA + E_EXP_CTL) the name and the phone number of the customs coworker who´s handling your customs declaration. As it seems, it´s only possible to see the name when you look into the Idocs. Has anybody an idea how we can pull this information into the customs protocol, so that users can see it without looking into the Idocs as it seems to complex for business.

 

Best regards,

Carsten

↧

Customs declaration sent after saving

March 17, 2016, 5:21 am
$
0
0

Hi,

after implementing the updates for AES 2.3 and GTS 11.0 our export declarations are send automatically to the customs authority. Before we always had to send the message to start the communication. How can we withdraw the new process so that we always have to send the message manually?

 

Thanks!

↧
Search

spl block while changing document

March 11, 2016, 3:25 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are getting SPL block for a quotation document when we change the business partner communication data (partner tab) in the document.

 

In SPRO we have only the name, city, street fields in the Address Comparison procedure and I assume communication data fields are not considered for screening.

 

So which fields does the system actually consider for changes during the screening document and blocking ?

 

How can we avoid a field from screening ?

 

Thanks

Sudesh

↧
↧

Export Control : CCAT Numbers & Pecularity Codes

April 20, 2010, 12:42 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are currently seting up compliance and we need to include the CCAT numbering into the scheme. As the CCAT is required for the Licence determination, and there does not seem to be a field aspecially for the CCAT Nr. we have decided to use the Pecularity code field to handle that number.

Has anyone made any experience with CCAT numbers and could provide some advice? Is it a good idea to use the Pecularity Code field for that?

 

Thanks for your input and Regards,

 

Marc

 

Edited by: Marc P. Gilomen on Apr 20, 2010 9:42 AM

↧

Materials Changed in ECC Appear as NEW in GTS

March 21, 2016, 12:47 pm
$
0
0

Our compliance team has noticed materials changed in ECC and sent to GTS via /SAPSLL/MATMAS_SLL are appearing as NEW in GTS rather than as changed.

3-21-2016 2-38-40 PM.jpg

 

Is it possible to distinguish NEW materials vs. CHANGED materials when coming from ECC to GTS?

 

Thank you,

Alison

↧

Hi please some one assist to me

March 18, 2016, 6:21 am
$
0
0

Hi,

please help to me

please find the attach Screen Shot.

i am using ECC to GTS System but the customer document is not move to ECC to GTS please help to me and RFC connection is working but custom document not move to GTS, what shall i do.

 

 

 

Thank you,

Narayana.

↧

License Block for Delivery in GTS in case of missing Legal Unit

March 21, 2016, 7:04 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

I have scenario where  LU which is combination of Storage Location Country/Plant/Storage Location- CN0001SLOC is not created in GTS. But Plant exists in GTS. Now from ECC the Delivery is created and its screened in GTS. As the Legal unit was not there, GTS used the country of Plant to run the legal determination check and it found the plant country and country of ship to party is same so no license check required.

But the storage location country was CN and country of plant was HK and so as country of Ship to party.

 


I know if Legal unit is created and not assigned to any license, system would definitely give the legal control block. But in this case as LU was not there, system ran the legal control check based on plant country.


Is there a way we can block the Delivery in GTS if Legal Unit is not created in GTS.


Thanks

Dushyant


↧
↧

Transport to downstream systems- Status in target system

March 17, 2016, 2:29 am
$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

Need your expertise..

 

I have down streaming FTO from GTS Prod to Target system R/3 Production..I am getting below meesage


"0 of 1 Business Partners are successfully transferred" and if i explore the

 

 

Message no. /SAPSLL/CORE_PARTNER402..

 

My question is how to check if the FTO to downstream was successful.  Do we have any tables either in GTS or R/3 end where we

can check the transport was successful.

 

Please help me.

↧

SAP GTS and REACH

March 25, 2016, 8:21 am
$
0
0

Hi, I see SAP GTS has the hazardous materials handling module, in your opinion is this sufficient to handle REACH processes? (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals)

 

What can be done? any handy links out there?

Any gaps?

 

I know EHS-SVT handles REACH but I want to do it all in GTS. Delusional or Realistic ?

 

Your thoughts please...

 

Regards

Philip

↧
Search

Delete external licences created in SAP GTS

March 24, 2016, 11:25 pm
$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

We have received requirement to delete the external licence created for some of the licence types. these licences should not be displayed as they are no longer in use and we do not want them to be marked as expired also.

 

 

Thanks

Swathi

↧

Legal Regulation Issue For Domestic License

March 23, 2016, 2:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi SAP Gurus,

 

Request you to please provide your Inputs to following Issue.

 

Requirement: Sales traction should check Domestic Licenses as per the Destination Country’s region. Each region has different License  so whenever performing domestic transaction for that state, transaction should check the Domestic Licenses.

 

I have done the required configuration and configured New Legal Regulation activated for Country US to US.

 

Issue: For export scenario system is  checking License for New legal regulation as per the partner country; even if no Export destination country maintained in legal regulation activation.

Could you please provide your Inputs on this Issue, also let me know if need more details about the Issue. Thank you.

 

Regards,

Sachin

↧
↧

Blocking BP for changed address in sales doc

December 21, 2015, 10:23 am
$
0
0

I have made the settings as synchronous in the Item category at app level in GTS 11, which I thought would keep the partner from getting blocked if it was changed in the document.

 

What I am seeing is that whenever I change the address to a BP such as the ship to the order gets blocked for SPL and in the audit trail it says that the address was changed manually.

 

Changing it to asynchronous seems to have the same behavior. Is there somewhere else I have missed a config setting?

↧

How to set 2 printers for same legal unit in SAP GTS,default data,printer determination?

March 24, 2016, 8:04 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I need to set up 2 different printers with the same legal unit for a message type, in SAP GTS customs declaration.

There is a option to enter default printer set up in customs management, printer determination, but I cannot add 2 different printers with same Legal Unit.

I cant use User ID as an option, as the outputs will be automatically defaulted.

 

In this case how to configure 2 different printers with same Legal Unit- in the node-" determine output device for foreign trade documents"

 

Kindly suggest.

 

Thanks in Advance,

 

Shilpa Babu

↧

Embargo Check

March 23, 2016, 12:36 am
$
0
0

Hi  All ,

 

GooD Day !

 

Can some  one tell me that what in the linking between Determination Procedure for Active Legal Regulationsand Define Legal Regulation

 

In Embargo Check ,

 

How embargo check work in SAP GTS .

 

Reagrds

Ramesh

↧
Viewing all 578 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>