Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP Global Trade Services (GTS)
Viewing all 578 articles
Browse latest View live

Application log download

$
0
0

One more question for the experts. I am not a big fan of the way SAP displays their application logs and they are very difficult to deal with.

 

Here is my problem. On my initial customer transfer to GTS there were various errors for missing data in the log that prevented the customers from being transferred.

 

I will need someone from the business to review the errors and correct, but when you save the logs you lose the icons and there is no way to pick out the errors unless you read every line.

 

If I try and remove the green lines in the detailed view before downloading then I lose what material the error relates too. It does seem like I can remove the lines that have a yellow icon as those don't reference the customer number and aren't hard errors.

 

Does anyone know a better way?

 

Thanks.


SAP GTS: Legal Control: Purchase order is locked

$
0
0

Hi GURUS,

Sorry..I search the thread but i can'nt found the solution for the below error..

Please any one help me...?

SAP GTS: Legal Control: Purchase order ........ is locked

 

My PO shows in GTS sactioned party list screening --> Display Technically Incomplete Documents-

 

But what to do after that or what config missing i dont know..!!

 

Edited by: skjain on May 16, 2011 1:10 PM

Partners not getting screened

$
0
0

I have just connected a second feeder system to our current GTS sandbox environment. I created a new logical system group etc.

 

I have transferred both customers and materials without issues.

 

I now wanted to screen the partners that I brought over but the message I get says "Unable to select any data".

 

My first thought was to look at the partner functions. I have them configured correctly I think and added them to the partner group used for SPL screening.

 

Any thoughts from the experts?

SPL : Manual change to document BP address overlooks BP negative list / Blocked BP entry

$
0
0

Hello GTSizans,

 

I have observed a gap in SAP GTS SPL functionality. If we manually change the BP address in a document in ECC system, then it overlooks the negative list entry or block for the BP in GTS.

 

That means if a business user changes the ECC document address, it generates a new address number in GTS system & hence it overlooks negative list entry for this BP and also BP block.

 

So by changing the address we may erroneously do a transaction with a blocked partner or negative list partner. Unfortunately no solution available in standard SAP GTS.

SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000100) not transferred

$
0
0

Hi All,

                 Whe I was trying to created delivery document number in unicode system I got 'SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000100) not transferred' this errror.

 

 

Could you please anybody help me out on this.

 

Thanks in Advance.

Regards,

J.

RFC Destn for GTS not defined uniquely

$
0
0

Hi Team,

I'm new to SAP GTS and please help me in fixing this issue.

I'm getting the below error while creating OB (VL10B) for Inter-Company STO in ECC.

 

"The RFC Destination for SAP GTS is not uniquely defined".

 

Thanks,

S.Balaji

Issue with Initial transferring of Material Master from Feeder system (ECC)

$
0
0

Hi,

 

While executing the initial transfer of material master data, we are getting the following error. we checked the entire RFC / ALE settings and all are fine. but not sure why this error message pop up. There is no sufficient explanation about this error message.

 

RFC error (The current application triggered a termination wi)

Message no. /SAPSLL/PLUGINR3101

 

Pls help

 

Regards,

Pradeep Maddi

Upgrade of ATLAS AES2.2

$
0
0

Hello Team,

 

We are upgrading AES 2.2 for that we are going to use note-2181629.

My question is to meet the new requirements of the German customs, ATLAS AES 2.2 customs process.

 

We want to use country “MK”(Macedonia ) for “EU” for customs declarations. If I will see the table-/SAPSLL/CTYGPA I can found country MK already assigned to group-CNTRYGR_AL & USREX_UNCR still do I need to define new group ? I need to use for ATLAS.


So please advise the configuration and how to test it ?


Thanks

Sits


"SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000010) not transferred".

$
0
0

Hi guys,

 

When we create outbound delivery for a sales order we are getting below message .

"SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000010) not transferred".

Could any body help in this issue.

 

Sreekanth

Possible to set a default Reason for Release

$
0
0

Is it possible to set a default SPL Reason for Release.  We are in the process of implementing reasons for release for our SPL blocks.  Our compliance team is wondering if it is possible to require the reason for release only for blocked BP's rather than documents.

 

I do not see a way to do this where I configured the release reasons.  Is there another place in the IMG this could be controlled?

 

6-22-2015 8-51-35 AM.jpg

 

Many thanks,

Alison

SAP GTS - How to do a company code/FTO conversion

$
0
0

Has anyone undergone a company code conversion in SAP ECC while running GTS? 

 

In this situation the company code for a open sales order or PO will change in ECC.  I have done several of these conversions in the past, however I just implemented GTS (Sanctioned Party List and Embargo Screening) and now have another company code conversion coming my way soon.  We use home-grown ABAP programs, Mircosoft Access routines, and some brute force to do the conversions in ECC.  What I don’t know yet is how GTS will react to a document that is in one company code/FTO today and a different company code/FTO tomorrow.  Will GTS be able to handle that situation and make the change automatically or do I need to run a conversion of some sort in GTS?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

Thank you,

Jeff

Excluding expired SPL listings from screening

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We are in GTS 7.2 Complaince Managment. We receive the SPL lists from third party service provider and the Buiness Partners are screened against these lists on nighlty basis. Now the daily SPL xml file contains Updation, Addition and modification to the existing SPL's and there fore there are delistings as well. So the expired SPL lists are also included in the file.

We observed that some days, many Business Partners are blocked against the expired SPL listings, which is an overhead for the business for analysis. The reason these are gettingblocked is because we use the satndard programs '/SAPSLL/SPL_CHECK_SCEN_C1M_LO', which screens against the updated SPL entries. Since delisting is also an updation to the existing SPL, this is considered as a change and the Partners are sceened against these SPL's.

 

Now our requirment is to exclude these delisted SPL lists from the screening. Is there anyway to achieve the same? I found that there is a setting in -

  • Go to IMG> SAP Global Trade Services> SAP Compliance Management> "Sanctioned Party List Screening" Service> Control Settings for "Sanctioned Party List Screening" Service. 
  • Highlight the appropriate SPL regulation. 
  • Select the "Details" button (or Ctrl+shift+F2). 
  • Set the "Consider Validity" field as required. 
    •    Include neither "valid from" or "valid to" date. 
    • A Include only "valid from" date. 
    • B Include only "valid to" date. 
    • C Include both valid from" or "valid to" date.

Currently in our system, the setting is option C ' include both valid from or valid to date' . Changing this to option 'B' ..i.e Include only Valid to date will work ?

 

Thanks,

Dhan

SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000100) not transferred

$
0
0

Hi All,

                 Whe I was trying to created delivery document number in unicode system I got 'SAP GTS: Legal control: Item (000100) not transferred' this errror.

 

 

Could you please anybody help me out on this.

 

Thanks in Advance.

Regards,

J.

Proforma Invoice not transferred to GTS

$
0
0

Hi,

 

When i create Proforam Invoice in ECC and the same document is NOT transferred to GTS. When i do manually transfer via Initial Transfer of documents, i'm getting message as "No relevant document types were selected"

 

In ECC (Feeder system), i have done the following configuation

 

For Application Level SD0C, BADI activated.

Path: SPRO - > Sales & Dist - > Foreign Trade -> SAP GTS PLUG In - > Activate Transfer of Billing document.

 

Also Proforma Invoice added to Application level SD0C and activated the SAP Customs Management and Risk management at the below menu path

SPRO -> SD -> Foreign Trade/Customs -> SAP GTS Plug-in -> Control data for transfer to SAP GTS -> Configure control settings for document transfer.

 

At GTS level, i have configured the following

 

IMG -> SAP GTS -> SAP Customs Management -> General settings -> Docuement Structure -> Assignment of Document types from Feeder systems -> Assign Document Type at Feeder system Level or Group level.

 

Feeder system Billing doc type F8 - Proforma Invoice is assigned to GTS doc type CULOEX.

 

Despite of above settings, Proforma invoice are not transferred upon creation.

 

Pls help to resolve this issue

 

 

Regards,

Pradeep Maddi

Master Data Copy

$
0
0

All,

 

A couple times a year, my company refreshes the SAP ECC and GTS dev and quality clients with production data using Avamar.

 

When the ECC copy of production is made, all the master data is copied automatically. When the GTS copy is created, the master data does not copy. As a result, I need to run background jobs to transfer customers, vendors and material masters from ECC to GTS. Each time we do a client copy, there are more materials in ECC and this transfer gets longer. It takes days to run.

 

Why doesn't the GTS master data copy during the backup / restore process?

 

I'm a business analyst and would appreciate a non-technical answer. Thank you so much.


Implementing Customs Management Module in Italy without implementing Licensing

$
0
0

Hi GTS Gurus

 

Question: Can we use custom management module for Italy without using Licensing module. In Italy Prior to make shipment,but only after receiving an actual purchase document, one must apprach to Italian minsitry in charge of exports and receive their license/consent.

 

Propsed Solution : We will set up the block in delivery in ECC. We will use proforma Invoice to send custom declataion form to Italy custom authorities from ECC.Then, as soon as the permission to ship is granted by Italian authorieties, the user could manually relese the block in GTS.

 

Doubt :

 

Would it be compulsary to impelement Licensing for Italy?

 

Will custom declaration document conatin all the information required by Italy authorities?

 

IT system of Italy with wich we need to set connection of R/3 or GTS?

 

Will the custom document clearance is enough or it is mandatory to obtain license from Italy agencies?

 

Thanks

Jaagrit Hooda

GTS Log Customs Document cannot be determined for external document type F8

$
0
0

Friends

 

Getting this error in GTS 10.1 version. Suddenly F8 has stopped getting transferred after a Retrofit to the Source System. Do anybody has a clue what could have happened? Appreciate help

 

Thanks

 

Keshav Murthy

Customer - Postal Code table

$
0
0

Hello,

 

 

I am looking for the table to get the customer Postal code details based on the country.I have tried linking BUT000 & BUTADRSEARCH with BP GUID , but no data.

 

Can some one please advice me on this .

 

And also want to know, is there any GTS standard country specific Postal code length.for India 6 digits and for Srilanka 5 digits ..like this.

 

Thanks

Diwakar Reddy

Legal Unit and Foreign Trade organization are not in same country

$
0
0

Hi all,

We are currently working on a Maquiladora project under which our plants in Mexico will be assigned to a US company code.

 

However, when we try to define this org structure in GTS, we are getting the below warning message while assigning the Legal Units (with MX address) to the FTO (US address). The system allows us to save the config, but it doesn't appear to work correctly. For example, when I simulate an import into MX plant, the system is applying the US legal regulation rather than MX.

Has anyone encounterred this error or any suggestions? (One idea we thought about is to define the FTO with a MX address, not sure if this would be the right thing to do; one additional problem is, the given FTO also includes other US plants for which we do want to apply US legal regulation, should we rather define an entirely separate company code (US address) & FTO (MX address) for the given MX plants??)..Can someone shed some light on this subject? Thanks in advance. -Raj Palanivel.

 

Below is the full details of the warning/error:

 

Legal Unit xxx and foreign trade organization yyy are not in same country

 

Diagnosis

You tried to assign  foreign trade orgnaization yyy in in US to legal unit xxx in MX.

This is not permitted. You must create the legal unit and the foreign trade organization in the same country.

 

System Response

The system does not permit this entry.

 

Procedure

Correct your entry.

Changed business Partner not passing to GTS

$
0
0

We are facing problems when trying to manually transfer a certain SAP customer master record  (ICXXXX) from ECC to GTS using t-code /SAPSLL/DEBMAS_DIRR3  we get  the error message

 

Of 1 selected partner(s), 0 were processed successfully

Message no. /SAPSLL/PLUGINR3111

 

Diagnosis

Not all partner masters have been processed successfully.

 

Procedure

You can access the process protocol in the Legal Service system. This protocol contains more information concerning the type of error that has occurred.

 

 

When our batch job runs for RBDMIDOC for /SAPSLL/DEBMAS/SLL  the job logs states "RFC error (this object is not consistent)"

 

The log does not give any information (t-code /SAPSLL/PARTNER_APPL)  even after changing  /SAPSLL/TCOPAO to have GN_TST (General: Full Log)  for Business Partner, sub-objects /SAPSLL/BP_DISTR and /SAPSLL/PARMA.

 

It appears to be an issue with this specific customer master.  I have created a new customer master ((ICXXXXA) that appears to be identical to the origional one and that one passes to GTS without issue.

 

Any thoughts on where else to look?

Viewing all 578 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>